ENG 1002 Writing Resources | R. Rambo Home Page
English Composition 2
Rubric for Essays
Below is the rubric that is included with graded essays. The rubric defines the criteria used to evaluate essays and allows you to see at a glance the strengths of your essay and what aspects of the essay could be better. It also presents information designed to help you strengthen your essays. For example, if the feedback on one of your essays indicates that the organization of the paper is "Okay," you can look at the description of "Excellent" organization on the rubric to see how the organization could be better.
Below the rubric is a table that lists grammar and punctuation errors. On graded essays, the "X" that is marked in each column indicates how many of each specific error occur in the essay: none, one or two, three or four, five or more.
Just click the links within the rubric and table below to see more information.
________________________________________________________________________________
ENG 1002-
Assignment:
Name:
Excellent |
Good |
Okay |
Weak |
Poor |
|||
The
paper has a central purpose and an insightful approach to the subject. The
introduction ends with a one-sentence thesis statement expressing the main
ideas and how they are logically related. |
The
paper has a clear approach to the subject. A thesis statement in the
introduction expresses the main ideas but may just list the ideas without
indicating how they are logically related. |
The
paper lacks a clear thesis or has a thesis that does not show insight into
the subject or is not expressed clearly in the introduction. Logical
connections among the main ideas may not be clear. |
|||||
Excellent |
Good |
Okay |
Weak |
Poor |
|||
The
paper is unified with a relevant introduction and conclusion, clear
connections between the thesis statement and topic sentences, focused body
paragraphs, effective topic sentences, a logical progression of ideas, and
smooth transitions. |
The
paper is organized logically, but there could be clearer connections between
topic sentences and the thesis statement, better-focused body paragraphs,
more effective topic sentences, a more logical progression of ideas, or
better transitions. |
The
paper does not show an understanding of essay structure. The paper may lack topic
sentences, connections between the thesis statement and body paragraphs, focused
body paragraphs, a logical progression of ideas, or effective transitions. |
|||||
Excellent |
Good |
Okay |
Weak |
Poor |
|||
Ideas
are developed with abundant evidence and clear explanation and interpretation
tailored to the audience. Each body paragraph is at least half of a page
long. |
Ideas
are developed with evidence and explanation tailored to the audience, but some
ideas may lack support. Most body paragraphs are at least half of a page long
each. |
Ideas
lack sufficient evidence and explanation, or the ideas are not appropriate
for the audience. Body paragraphs may be shorter than half of a page each. |
|||||
Excellent |
Good |
Okay |
Weak |
Poor |
|||
The
ideas are consistently original and insightful and demonstrate a sophistication
and complexity of thought. |
The
ideas are generally clear and logical, perhaps relying heavily on commonly
accepted concepts. |
The
ideas are not consistently clear or logical, lack insight, or rely entirely
on commonly accepted concepts. |
|||||
Excellent |
Good |
Okay |
Weak |
Poor |
|||
The
paper expresses ideas clearly, with a confident and sophisticated writing
style, quotations smoothly integrated, varied sentences, effective word
choice, and logical transitions. |
The
paper expresses ideas clearly but with mostly undistinguished word choice and
sentence structure and may include weaknesses such as informal diction and
overuse of short sentences. |
The
paper includes significant weaknesses, such as informal diction, quotations
not integrated, overuse of short sentences, awkward wording, and sentences
weakened by grammar/punctuation errors. |
|||||
Excellent |
Good |
Okay |
Weak |
Poor |
|||
The
paper is free or almost free from grammar and punctuation errors. The format
of the paper is correct. |
The
paper has grammar and punctuation errors, but most errors are minor. Most of
the formatting is correct. |
The
paper has many grammar and punctuation errors and may have major errors. There
may be formatting problems. |
|||||
Number
of Errors |
0 |
1-2 |
3-4 |
5+ |
|
Number
of Errors |
0 |
1-2 |
3-4 |
5+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Spelling
Errors |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Other
Errors |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments |
Grade:
|
Copyright Randy Rambo, 2019.